Mobile app testing is complex and time-consuming, which may increase the time to market. However, ignoring app testing can be a costly affair as it could result in damaging the company’s reputation, a decline in clientele, and, eventually, loss of business revenue.
Today mobile applications have become an integral part of our life, so businesses must ensure that their application performs well across various devices and screen sizes. It can be achieved only through cross-browser testing. But one of the biggest challenges faced by the testing teams is the availability of physical devices.
This is precisely where real device cloud testing comes into the picture. It has evolved as an efficient method of testing mobile applications on various devices without needing an actual device. This kind of testing has multiple advantages, including lower costs, scalability, and a shorter time to market. However, it doesn’t mean that you can ignore the importance of physical device testing.
This article will thoroughly explain the differences between physical device testing and real device testing on the cloud.
Key differences between physical devices and real device cloud testing
While physical device testing is crucial in particular businesses that require testing on specific equipment, real device cloud testing is slowly gaining popularity among small and medium organizations. Companies must evaluate their needs and select the approach that best meets their demands. The significance of mobile app testing tools online is also noteworthy, as they can make the testing process more efficient and effective.
Remote Working Flexibility
Real device cloud testing gives testers more flexibility with remote work because they can access the devices from anywhere at any time. On the other hand, testing on physical devices requires the presence of testers in the same location as that of the device, making it impossible for remote teams to manage.
Cost
Physical device testing can be costly because companies must buy and keep the physical devices. Whereas Real device cloud testing does not require users to pay for any physical device, and instead have to only pay for the time they use the devices or a subscription to access real devices on cloud.
Maintenance
When it comes to maintenance, the tester has to ensure that their physical device is up to date by regularly updating the program and taking care of the device repairs. Whereas in the case of real device testing, the cloud testing platform takes care of all the issues related to the maintenance.
Speed
In today’s digital world, less time to market is a crucial strategy that can make or break any company. Hence the testing approach must be quick. Compared to physical devices, real device testing on cloud offers faster testing speeds even when businesses need to test the application on multiple devices. The importance of mobile app testing tools online cannot be emphasized enough, especially when it comes to reducing the time-to-market and increased revenue.
Geolocation Testing
Geolocation testing is a feature that enables companies to test their applications in various parts of the globe. Although both physical device testing and real device testing support geolocation testing. Businesses prefer the latter option due to the economy associated with it.
Procurement Cost
Businesses must purchase the devices needed for physical testing, which can be expensive. At the same time, real device testing provides all the necessary infrastructure on cloud with the device on-demand option. This reduces the operation cost of the organization.
Parallel Testing
With features like parallel testing, real device cloud testing allows testers to test their application across several devices at once. This makes this testing procedure popular among small and medium enterprises. In contrast, parallel testing is a feature that is impossible for physical device testing.
Scalability
Real device cloud testing increases scalability because companies may simultaneously test the application across various devices. Scaling physical device testing can be difficult, particularly for companies needing to test the application on several devices simultaneously.
Which is best for your business?
Suppose you are a chef, and for creating your specialty dish, you have two options either use fresh or pre-packaged ingredients. Choosing fresh ingredients gives you more flexibility and control over the preparation but requires more expertise. Whereas pre-packed ingredients offer more convenient and quicker options. Similarly, Physical device testing takes more time and resources but provides more flexibility. And just like packaged ingredients real device cloud testing offers quicker and more effective solutions even for a non-technical person. Ultimately, the choice between physical device testing and real device cloud testing will depend on your business’s specific needs and goals. Whatever strategy you select, remember that the ultimate goal is to provide your customers with a delightful and satisfying experience.
Conclusion
Businesses must ensure their mobile apps are highly functional and of excellent quality as the market for mobile apps expands at an unprecedented rate. The key to achieving this is picking the correct mobile app testing strategy. Relying on conventional physical devices to test your mobile apps might not be the most effective strategy in today’s fast-paced world. Whereas real device cloud testing offer businesses the flexibility and scalability needed to test their apps on a big scale.
With the future of mobile app testing looking towards cloud-based solutions, it’s essential to partner with a service provider like pCloudy.
If you found our content helpful don’t forget to share it on your social media: Twitter.
For more insightful articles, please visit Bloghart.
